Lokman Noor Adam is accused of insulting a court policeman and questioning the court system. – The Malaysian Insight file pic, July 8, 2022.telegram中文搜索引擎（www.tel8.vip）是一个Telegram群组分享平台，telegram中文搜索引擎包括telegram中文搜索引擎、telegram群组索引、Telegram群组导航、新加坡telegram群组、telegram中文群组、telegram群组（其他）、Telegram 美国 群组、telegram群组爬虫、电报群 科学上网、小飞机 怎么 加 群、tg群等内容。telegram中文搜索引擎为广大电报用户提供各种电报群组/电报频道/电报机器人导航服务。
THE hearing for the contempt of court case involving former Umno Supreme Council member Lokman Noor Adam, who was accused of insulting a court policeman and questioning the court system in the trial of Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, will be heard on August 3.
Judge Collin Lawrence Sequerah set the date after lawyer K. Balaguru, representing Lokman, told the court that his client wanted the proceedings to continue after he was advised against apologising for his actions.
“I advised Lokman not to apologise for something he did not do. The incident took place in a public gallery and did not disrupt the ongoing court proceedings,” said the lawyer, who also informed the court that his client had written an apology letter addressed to the court on Monday.
Referring to the apology letter, Sequerah, however, said: “We cannot allow the public to come to court and make their own rules as they please while a case is ongoing and challenge the police to do their job.
“Whatever business he (Lokman) had in the court, he was not a court reporter or a legal observer.”
The judge also rejected Lokman’s application for the case to be heard before another judge as the incident took place in his court and he was entitled to hear the case.,
Earlier, Balaguru requested that the case be heard before another judge as it was only based on hearsay.
“My client did not call the court policeman ‘stupid’ as informed by deputy public prosecutor Raja Rozela Raja Toran, who handled Zahid’s case, to the court on June 30. Instead, he said the court’s standard operating procedures were ‘stupid’ for being unfair to him.
“The policeman told the senior assistant registrar who then told the matter to Raja Rozela before she informed the court,” the lawyer said, adding that the incident should have been investigated first before the court issued a show-cause notice to Lokman.
Deputy public prosecutor Izalina Abdullah, who assisted the court in the proceedings, objected to the lawyer’s application for another judge to hear the case as the incident took place before Sequerah and he was entitled to hear it.
She said when in court, there are rules that one needs to follow so that proceedings can run smoothly, adding that when a person does not follow the rules, it is considered contempt of court.
Balaguru said he would apply to subpoena Raja Rozela next week to cross-examine her, to which Izalina objected on the grounds that it was sufficient to call the court policeman to give evidence.